Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5561359-20150311194825/@comment-5561359-20150411033006

Hi Pat,

I understand the "cardinal" vs "ordinal" mixup. I always confuse the two as well so it's not a problem!

With regards to "break the headers into three", I think I understand now and I agree with that format.

Pertaining to "Fast Forward", I'm sorry as in my previous message I wasn't clear with what I meant. What I meant to say was that, if a team went for the FF but lost it to another team I think a note should be made to represent that event (maybe through a star above the place a team was in when they returned to the regular racecourse after going for it?)

In response to the final three answers:

1. Sounds good!

2. Makes sense, but if there are instances where we can suppose their places (i.e. Team A/B arrived at the clue box first and C/D was obviously behind them but their placements aren't noted on-screen) can we use supposition there? Referencing Reality Fan wiki seems a very good idea.

3. What I meant was "Besides the "U-Turn/Yield" and "Airport" columns, the table will track what placements the teams were in at each cluebox instead of getting super-specific and showing what places the teams were in in-between clues such as when they were travelling to the next clue". Does that make sense?

Thank you!

Linusblanket2100